In the Matter of the Complaint of Columbia Leasing L.L.C. as Previous Owner, and Columbia Coastal Transport, L.L.C., as Present Owner and Previous Owner Pro Hac Vice of the Barge Columbia Houston Offi v. NONE

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit Virginia Eastern District In the Matter of the Complaint of Columbia Leasing L.L.C. as Previous Owner, and Columbia Coastal Transport, L.L.C., as Present Owner and Previous Owner Pro Hac Vice of the Barge Columbia Houston Offi v. NONE

Plaintiff:	In the Matter of the Complaint of Columbia Leasing L.L.C. as Previous Owner, and Columbia Coastal Transport, L.L.C.,
Case Number:	2:2012cv00678
Filed:	December 13, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Norfolk Office
County:	Norfolk City
Presiding Judge:	Mark S. Davis
Presiding Judge:	Tommy E. Miller
Nature of Suit:	Marine
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 20, 2014	Filing 90 ORDER Granting 79 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss. For the reasons set forth above, the Mullens' motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41(a) (2) is GRANTED, as there is no unfair prejudice to Ceres. Therefore, the Mullens' crossclaims against Ceres are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Such dismissal brings this action to an end. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 2/20/14. Copies distributed to all counsel of record 2/20/14. (ldab, )
January 10, 2014	Filing 78 OPINION AND ORDER - granting 46 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Mullens' motion for relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 56(d) is DISMISSED AS MOOT, as the discovery disputes have since been resolved and, in any event, the evidence so ught would not have aided the Court in its decision. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, as the Mullens have failed to show that there is any genuine issue of material fact as to whether Plaintiffs violated any of the duties owed to them. Therefore, the Mullens' claims against Plaintiffs are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Ceres' contribution claim against Limitation Plaintiffs is DISMISSED AS MOOT, as Plaintiffs are not liable to the Mullens for their negligence claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 1/10/14. Copies distributed to all counsel of record 1/10/14. (ldab, )

Date Filed

Document Text

February 20, 2014

Filing 90 ORDER Granting 79 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss. For the reasons set forth above, the Mullens' motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41(a) (2) is GRANTED, as there is no unfair prejudice to Ceres. Therefore, the Mullens' crossclaims against Ceres are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Such dismissal brings this action to an end. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 2/20/14. Copies distributed to all counsel of record 2/20/14. (ldab, )

January 10, 2014

Filing 78 OPINION AND ORDER - granting 46 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Mullens' motion for relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 56(d) is DISMISSED AS MOOT, as the discovery disputes have since been resolved and, in any event, the evidence so ught would not have aided the Court in its decision. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, as the Mullens have failed to show that there is any genuine issue of material fact as to whether Plaintiffs violated any of the duties owed to them. Therefore, the Mullens' claims against Plaintiffs are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Ceres' contribution claim against Limitation Plaintiffs is DISMISSED AS MOOT, as Plaintiffs are not liable to the Mullens for their negligence claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 1/10/14. Copies distributed to all counsel of record 1/10/14. (ldab, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In the Matter of the Complaint of Columbia Leasing L.L.C. as Previous Owner, and Columbia Coastal Transport, L.L.C., as Present Owner and Previous Owner Pro Hac Vice of the Barge Columbia Houston Offi v. NONE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: In the Matter of the Complaint of Columbia Leasing L.L.C. as Previous Owner, and Columbia Coastal Transport, L.L.C.,
Represented By:	Patrick Michael Brogan
Represented By:	Philip Norton Davey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?