United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Woodard et al
United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
Cynthia A. Sabol, Stephen G. Fields and Edward J. Woodard, Jr. |
2:2013cv00016 |
January 9, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Norfolk Office |
Norfolk City |
Mark S. Davis |
Douglas E. Miller |
Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 MEMORANDUM ORDER: In summary, as the previous basis for staying this case(the then ongoing criminal prosecution of Defendants Woodard and Fields) no longer justifies a stay, and because Defendant Sabol has failed to demonstrate that another lengthy stay of this year-old case is appropriate, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to lift the stay and reopen the case (ECF. No. 38), and DENIES Defendant Sabol's motion to continue the stay (ECF No. 34). As to the several pending motions to s eal, each is DENIED as no adequate legal basis for sealing has been presented to the Court (ECF. Nos. 35, 39, and 43). The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Memorandum Order to all counsel of record. Additionally, the Clerk is DIRECTED to pl ace this case back on the Court's active docket, and to remove the "SEALED" tag on the filings associated with the motions to stay (ECF Nos. 36, 37, 42, 46 and 47). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 1/6/14. Copies distributed to all parties 1/7/14.(ldab, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.