World Fuel Services Trading, DMCC v. M/V HEBEI SHIJIAZHUANG
| World Fuel Services Trading, DMCC |
| M/V HEBEI SHIJIAZHUANG |
| HEIBEI PRINCE SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD. |
| 2:2013cv00173 |
| April 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Out of Country |
| Mark S. Davis |
| Douglas E. Miller |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, the Court awardsprejudgment interest to Plaintiff at the prime rate, accruing from November 28, 2012. The parties are ORDERED to submit to the Court, jointly if possible, a proposed order for the C ourt's approval, filed no later than Thursday, April 17, 2014, indicating the prejudgment interest amount Claimant owes toPlaintiff, calculated in accordance with this Opinion and Order, as well as the agreed amount of custodia legis expenses. (See Order and Foot Notes for Specifics) Entered and filed 4/9/14. (Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 4/9/14). Copies provided as directed on4/9/14.(ecav, )
|
|
Filing
97
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in this Opinion and Order, Claimant's Rule 56(d) motion for additional time to complete discovery is DISMISSED AS MOOT. Claimant's 64 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Plaintiff� 39;s 29 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The trial scheduled to commence on Tuesday, April 8, 2014, will be limited to the following "triable issues" indicated in the March 27, 2014 final pretrial order: "the total amount due to Plaintiff for which it has a maritime lien on the Vessel," "whether Plaintiff is entitled to prejudgment interest," and "whether Plaintiff is entitled to administrative charges, custodian legis expenses, attorney fees and inte rest." ECF No. 85 at 21; see Triton Marine Fuels, Ltd. v. M/V PACIFIC CHUKOTKA, 671 F. Supp. 2d 753, 760 (D. Md. 2009) (citing Bradford Marine, Inc. v. M/V SEA FALCON, 64 F.3d 585, 589-90) (observing that "an FMLA lien does not necessarily cover all the terms of the underlying contract"), as outlined. (See Opinion and Order for Specifics) Entered 4/3/14 and filed 4/4/14. (Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 4/3/14). Copies provided as directed on 4/4/14.(ecav, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
