Lifenet Health v. Lifecell Corporation
Plaintiff: LifeNet Health
Defendant: LifeCell Corporation
Case Number: 2:2013cv00486
Filed: September 6, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Virginia Beach City
Presiding Judge: Douglas E. Miller
Presiding Judge: Henry C. Morgan
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 281
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 481 OPINION AND ORDER Denying re: 415 Motion for New Trial; & 419 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law.. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr and filed on 3/18/15. Copies distributed to all parties 3/18/15. (ldab, )
February 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 459 OPINION AND ORDER Denying 417 MOTION For a Finding of Laches Under Rule 52(c).. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr and filed on 2/4/15. Copies distributed to all parties 2/5/15. (ldab, )
January 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 437 OPINION AND ORDER Denying 425 Motion to Seal. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr and filed on 1/9/15. Copies distributed to all parties 1/9/15. (ldab, )
December 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 413 OPINION AND ORDER that the Court GRANTS the 399 Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment Pending the Disposition of Post-Trial Motions, subject to Defendant posting security in the full amount of the judgment in either cash or with the posting of a surety bond with security approved by the Court. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr and filed on 12/17/2014. (rsim, )
October 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 324 OPINION AND ORDER reserving ruling in part, granting in part and denying in part 220 Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Mark Gallagher by LifeCell Corporation; denying 226 Motion in Limine Plaintiffs Motion in Limine No. 1: Motion to Exclude Te stimony Regarding Defendants Two-Minute-Rinse Defense by LifeNet Health; reserving ruling on 228 Motion in Limine Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 2: Motion to Exclude Use of Any Alleged Prior Art Documents That Do Not Pre-Date the Invention Date of U.S. Patent No. 6,569,200 by LifeNet Health; reserving ruling on 230 Motion in Limine Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 3: Motion to Exclude the Testimony of LifeCell's Experts, Drs. Erdmann and Duda by LifeNet Health; reserving r uling on 232 Motion in Limine Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 4: Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Defendant's Patent Expert John Doll Regarding LifeCell's Actual or Presumed Knowledge of U.S. Patent No. 6,569,200 by LifeNet Healt h; denying 234 Motion in Limine Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 5: Motion to Exclude Testing and Testimony Related to the Alleged Removal of Plasticizer from LifeCell's Soft Tissue Product by LifeNet Health; denying 237 Motion in Lim ine Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 6: Motion to Exclude Testimony Regarding Defendant's Opinions and Testimony on Non-Infringing Alternatives by LifeNet Health; denying 240 Motion in Limine Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 7: Moti on to Exclude the Testimony of Defendant's Damages Expert Regarding the Attributes of the 200 Patent by LifeNet Health; reserved ruling in part and granting in part and denying in part 243 Motion in Limine Consolidated Motions in Limine Nos. 1-8 by LifeCell Corporation; denying 283 Motion to Seal. A copy of this order was distributed to all counsel of record on 10/31/14. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr and filed on 10/31/14. (tbro)
October 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 298 OPINION AND ORDER re: 137 Motion for Summary Judgment 182 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Brief In Support. Accordingly, the cross Motions for Summary Judgment. Docs. 137 & 182, were DENIED. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr on 10/27/14.Copies distributed to all counsel of record 10/27/14. (ldab, )
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER re: 46 Motion to Compel; & 74 Motion to Compel. For the reasons stated on the record and elaborated herein, the Court GRANTED the Motions in Part. Docs. 46, 74. All answers and productions are clue within ten (10) days of the date of the hearing. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr on 8/14/14 and filed 8/19/14. Copies distributed to all parties 8/19/14. (ldab, )
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 122 OPINION AND ORDER re 116 Markman Hearing,,,. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr on 7/16/14 and filed 7/18/14. Copies distributed to all parties 7/18/14. (ldab, )
July 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 123 OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr on 7/16/14. (afar)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lifenet Health v. Lifecell Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LifeNet Health
Represented By: Michael Harry Jacobs
Represented By: Stephen Edward Noona
Represented By: Mark Edward Warmbier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LifeCell Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?