APM Terminals North America, Inc. v. Versiant Corporation, Inc.
APM Terminals North America, Inc. |
Versiant Corporation, Inc. |
2:2013cv00579 |
October 24, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Norfolk Office |
Portsmouth City |
Robert G Doumar |
Douglas E Miller |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 AGREED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL ORDER. The Court having considered the motion and finding it to be well taken, GRANTS the voluntary dismissal of this action, without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Robert G. Doumar on 2/3/14. (tbro) |
Filing 29 Motion Hearing before District Judge Robert G. Doumar held on 1/8/2014 re #15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by APM Terminals North America, Inc. Appearances: Robert W. McFarland and Christopher L. Harlow for the Plaintiff. Brian N. Casey and James D. Bishop for the Defendant. Hearing held as to #15 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Arguments of counsel heard. Comments of Court presented. The Court directed that the parties attend a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller, who was present at the hearing. Court was adjourned and the parties retired to the settlement conference. (Court Reporter Heidi Jeffreys, OCR.)(lbax, ) |
Filing 28 ORDER GRANTING the attorney's request on behalf of Versiant Cooperation to bring a laptop computer into the courtroom for evidence presentation and power point use, provided that the computer's wireless Internet capability is disabled and at no point during the hearing the computer is capable of being connected to the Internet. Entered and filed 1/6/14. (Signed by District Judge Robert G. Doumar on 1/6/14). (Attachments: #1 Letter)(ecav, ) |
Filing 27 Declaration re #26 Reply to Response to Motion by APM Terminals North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(McFarland, Robert) |
Filing 26 REPLY to Response to Motion re #15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by APM Terminals North America, Inc.. (McFarland, Robert) |
Filing 25 EXHIBIT - CORRECTED Exhibit 12 to McKaughan declaration (Document No. 24-16) by Versiant Corporation, Inc... (Casey, Brian) |
Filing 24 RESPONSE in Opposition re #15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Versiant Corporation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 unreported case, #2 Affidavit Massardo declaration, #3 Affidavit Fogarty declaration, #4 Affidavit McKaughan declaration, #5 Exhibit 1 to McKaughan decl, #6 Exhibit 2 to McKaughan decl, #7 Exhibit 3 to McKaughan decl, #8 Exhibit 4 to McKaughan decl, #9 Exhibit 5 to McKaughan decl, #10 Exhibit 6 to McKaughan decl, #11 Exhibit 7 to McKaughan decl, #12 Exhibit 8 to McKaughan decl, #13 Exhibit 9 to McKaughan decl, #14 Exhibit 10 to McKaughan decl, #15 Exhibit 11 to McKaughan decl, #16 Exhibit 12 to McKaughan decl, #17 Exhibit 13 to McKaughan decl)(Casey, Brian) |
Filing 23 REPLY to Response to Motion re #12 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay filed by Versiant Corporation, Inc.. (Casey, Brian) |
Filing 22 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's #17 Motion to Expedite Briefing and Argument and sets the hearing date for the #15 Motion for Preliminary Injunction for January 8, 2014, @ 2:00 p.m., as outlined. (See Order for Specifics) Entered 12/16/13 and filed 12/17/13. (Signed by District Judge Robert G. Doumar on 12/16/13). (ecav, ) |
Motion Hearing as to #15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction set for 1/8/2014 at 02:00 PM in Norfolk Grand Jury Courtroom before District Judge Robert G. Doumar. (lbax, ) |
Filing 21 Opposition to #12 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay filed by APM Terminals North America, Inc.. (McFarland, Robert) |
Filing 20 Brief in Support to #17 MOTION to Expedite Briefing and Argument on Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by APM Terminals North America, Inc.. (McFarland, Robert) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #17 MOTION to Expedite Briefing and Argument on Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Versiant Corporation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of McKaughan, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Massardo)(Casey, Brian) |
Filing 18 Memorandum in Support re #17 MOTION to Expedite Briefing and Argument on Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by APM Terminals North America, Inc.. (McFarland, Robert) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Expedite Briefing and Argument on Motion for Preliminary Injunction by APM Terminals North America, Inc.. (McFarland, Robert) |
Filing 16 Memorandum in Support re #15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by APM Terminals North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Pollard Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1-Part 1 to Pollard Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1 -Part 2 to Pollard Declaration, #4 Exhibit 2 to Pollard Declaration, #5 Exhibit 3 to Pollard Declaration, #6 Exhibit 4 to Pollard Declaration)(McFarland, Robert) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by APM Terminals North America, Inc.. (McFarland, Robert) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Pro hac vice for James Daniel Bishop as to Versiant Corporation, Inc.. Signed by District Judge Robert G. Doumar on 12/2/13. (tlev, ) |
Filing 13 Memorandum in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay filed by Versiant Corporation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit McKaughan, #2 Affidavit Massardo)(Casey, Brian) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss or Stay by Versiant Corporation, Inc.. (Casey, Brian) |
Filing 10 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Versiant Corporation, Inc.. (Casey, Brian) |
Filing 9 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by James Daniel Bishop and Certification of Local Counsel Brian N. Casey Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-3759238. by Versiant Corporation, Inc.. (Casey, Brian) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Nelson Casey on behalf of Versiant Corporation, Inc. (Casey, Brian) |
Filing 11 SUMMONSES (2 returned Executed and 1 blank) as to Versiant Corporation, Inc. served on 11/7/2013, via registered agents. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(ecav, ) |
Filing 7 Three Summons with one copy each issued as to Versiant Corporation, Inc. and provided to counsel for service. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Notice & Judge's Instructions)(rsim, ) |
Filing 6 Withdrawal of Motion by APM Terminals North America, Inc. re #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (McFarland, Robert) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Kate McConaughy on behalf of APM Terminals North America, Inc. (McConaughy, Sarah) |
Filing 4 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by APM Terminals North America, Inc.. (McFarland, Robert) |
Filing 3 Memorandum in Support re #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by APM Terminals North America, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Part One, #2 Exhibit 1-Part Two)(bgra, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by APM Terminals North America, Inc. (bgra, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Versiant Corporation, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 24683021218), filed by APM Terminals North America, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt, #3 Letter)(bgra) |
Notice of Correction re #1 Complaint: A financial disclosure statement was not filed with the first appearance of the party as required by Local Rule 7.1. The party is allowed seven (7) days to correct the deficiency and file the financial disclosure statement. Failure to file the financial disclosure statement within this period of time will subject the document to being stricken from the record. (bgra, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.