Southern Bank and Trust Company v. Pride Group, LLC et al
| Southern Bank and Trust Company |
| Pride Group, LLC, Pradip Shah, Vijay Patel and Vijay Shah |
| 2:2014cv00255 |
| May 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Norfolk City |
| Mark S. Davis |
| Douglas E. Miller |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
OPINION AND ORDER that the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to the extent it seeks default judgment in this action, but DENIES such motion to the extent Plaintiff seeks post-judgment interest in excess of the rate established by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to the extent it seeks an award of reasonable attorneys' fees, but, as noted above, DENIES Plaintiff& #039;s motion to the extent the attorneys' fees sought by Plaintiff are unreasonable; directing the Clerk to judgment against PrideGroup, LLC, Pradip Shah, Vijay Patel, and Vijay Shah in the amount of $1,693,488.11 in principal, $275,9 04.09 in pre-judgment interest through September 19, 2014, pre-judgment interest at the rate of $505.69 per diem between such date and the entry of judgment, post-judgment interest at the rate set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a), and attorneys' fees and costs inthe amount of $121,378. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 1/28/2015. (rsim, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
