Singh et al v. Interactive Brokers, LLC et al
| Charanjit Singh and Parbhur Singh |
| Interactive Brokers LLC, Brar Capital LLC and Vikas Brar |
| 2:2016cv00276 |
| June 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Virginia Beach City |
| Douglas E. Miller |
| Henry C. Morgan |
| Other Fraud |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS as follows. Plaintiffs' Motion toVacate or Modify Arbitration Award is DENIED. ECF No. 42. Interactive Brokers LLC's Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award is GRANTED. ECF No. 51. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment as outlined. Signed by District Judge Robert G. Doumar on 12/17/19. (afar)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER Granting (5) Motion to Compel in case 2:16-cv-00276- RGD-DEM; Granting (6) Motion to Compel in case 2:16-cv-00277-RGD-DEM. Accordingly, IB's Motions to Compel Arbitration (ECF No. 5 in Civil No. 2:16cv276 and ECF No. 6 in C ivil No. 2:16cv277), are hereby GRANTED, and the instant action is STAYED for the shorter of five (5) months or until completion of arbitration, or until such further order that this Court may enter. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert G. Doumar and filed on 11/30/16. Copies distributed to all parties 11/30/16. Associated Cases: 2:16-cv-00276-RGD-DEM, 2:16-cv-00277-RGD-DEM(ldab, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
