McKendrick v. Clarke
Petitioner: Matthew McKendrick
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Case Number: 2:2016cv00600
Filed: October 7, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Richmond
Presiding Judge: Douglas E. Miller
Presiding Judge: Rebecca Beach Smith
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 FINAL ORDER. It is ORDERED that 8 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and the the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 3/28/2017. Copies mailed 3/28/2017. (jmey, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKendrick v. Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Matthew McKendrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Represented By: Elizabeth Kiernan Fitzgerald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?