Drewrey v. Portsmouth Public Schools et al
| Russell A. Drewrey |
| Portsmouth Public Schools, Elie Bracy, III, Ed. D, James E. Bridgeford, Joseph A. Fleming, Sarah Duncan Hinds, Ted I. Lamb, B. Keith Nance, Sr., Claude C. Parent, Cardell C. Patillo, Ingrid Whitaker and Costella B. Williams |
| 2:2017cv00020 |
| January 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Chesapeake City |
| Douglas E. Miller |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
OPINION AND FINAL ORDER granting 50 Motion for Summary Judgment by Portsmouth City School Board. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of the Defendant Portsmouth School Board on the failure to promote claim and DISMISS the retaliation claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller and filed on 3/21/18. (tbro)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 26 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Portsmouth City School Board; adopting 35 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations. The Board's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's R&R are OVERR ULED, and the Magistrate Judge's R&R is hereby ADOPTED AND APPROVED IN FULL. The Motion to Dismiss is DENIED, and the Plaintiff may proceed on the ADEA claims against the Board. Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 9/6/17. (tbro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
