Awan v. Berryhill

Plaintiff: Saif Awan
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 2:2017cv00189
Filed: April 5, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Chesapeake City
Referring Judge: Douglas E. Miller
Presiding Judge: Rebecca Beach Smith
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42:416
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 FINAL ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and the final decision of the Acting Commissioner is AFFIRMED. Copies of this Order sent as DIRECTED on 2.26.18. Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 2/26/2018. (epri)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Awan v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saif Awan
Represented By: Barrett Rives Richardson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Virginia Lynn Van Valkenburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?