John T. Midgett, Trustee of the Hardcastle Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust Dated August 6, 2007 v. Hardcastle

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit Virginia Eastern District John T. Midgett, Trustee of the Hardcastle Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust Dated August 6, 2007 v. Hardcastle

John T. Midgett, Trustee of the Hardcastle Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust Dated August 6, 2007 v. Hardcastle

Plaintiff:	John T. Midgett, Trustee of the Hardcastle Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust Dated August 6, 2007
Defendant:	Maile Susan Hardcastle
Case Number:	2:2017cv00663
Filed:	December 27, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Norfolk Office
County:	Virginia Beach City
Presiding Judge:	Raymond A. Jackson
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence R. Leonard
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 3, 2018	Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF no. 24) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that the Court has reconsidered its July 19, 2018 Order on the Motion to Amend Answ er and Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. The Motion is DENIED to the extent that the Defendant's Motion to Amend Answer is now DENIED based solely on the Court's analysis under Rule 15 and Defendant's Motion to Amend Scheduling Order is DENIED. The Motion to request a certification for interlocutory appeal is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/3/2018. (jrin)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 3, 2018

Filing 56 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration (ECF no. 24) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that the Court has reconsidered its July 19, 2018 Order on the Motion to Amend Answ er and Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. The Motion is DENIED to the extent that the Defendant's Motion to Amend Answer is now DENIED based solely on the Court's analysis under Rule 15 and Defendant's Motion to Amend Scheduling Order is DENIED. The Motion to request a certification for interlocutory appeal is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/3/2018. (jrin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John T. Midgett, Trustee of the Hardcastle Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust Dated August 6, 2007 v. Hardcastle
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: John T. Midgett, Trustee of the Hardcastle Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust Dated August 6, 2007
Represented By:	Glen Michael Robertson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Maile Susan Hardcastle
Represented By:	William Thomas Chappell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?