Hicks v. Ziglar
| Donnie Hicks |
| Gregory Julian Ziglar |
| USBC-Norfolk/NN (United States Bankruptcy Court) |
| U.S. Trustee |
| 2:2018cv00568 |
| October 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Arenda L Wright Allen |
| Raymond A Jackson |
| Robert J Krask |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER: The Court finds that (i) Plaintiff is not entitled to a jury trial, (ii) there is no need for this Court to withdraw the referral to the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157(d),and (iii) Adversary Proceeding No. 18-07027 should REMAIN REFERRED to the Bankruptcy Court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate this action on this Court's docket. Copies of this Order sent as DIRECTED on 11.6.18. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and filed on 11/5/2018. (epri, )
|
| Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask no longer assigned to the case. (epri, ) |
| Case Reassigned to District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen. District Judge Raymond A. Jackson no longer assigned to the case. (epri, ) |
| Filing 1 Bankruptcy Transmittal Cover Sheet. (Attachments: #1 Bankruptcy Documents)(epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
