Gilmore v. Louka, Esquire et al
Plaintiff: Victor Gilmore
Defendant: Tariq K. Louka, Esquire, Emerald Point Apartments and Results Unlimited, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2018cv00634
Filed: November 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Mark S Davis
Referring Judge: Douglas E Miller
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2019 Filing 7 Waiver of the Service of Summons by Results Unlimited, Inc. (Canter, Ronald)
January 25, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald Scott Canter on behalf of Results Unlimited, Inc. (Canter, Ronald)
January 16, 2019 Filing 5 Waiver of Service of Summons by Tariq K. Louka, Esquire (Cales, James)
January 2, 2019 Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Victor Gilmore. (epri, )
January 2, 2019 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Emerald Point Apartments, Tariq K. Louka, Esquire, Results Unlimited, Inc., filed by Victor Gilmore.(epri, )
January 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Plaintiff's IFP Application, ECF No. 1, is GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff' s Complaint and Jury Demand. The Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare a Notice of Lawsuit and Waiver of Service form for Defendants. A copy of the Complaint, Jury Demand, this Order, the Notice of Lawsuit, and two copies of the Waiver of Service form are to be sent to each Defendant at the address provided by Plaintiff. If any Defendant fails to waive service, the Clerk is DIRECTED to (i) issue summons, (ii) prepare a packet containing a summons, a copy of the Complaint, Jury Demand, and this Order for any such Defendant, and (iii) deliver the packet to the United States Marshal, who is DIRECTED to serve the packet upon any such Defendant. A copy of this Order was sent to Plaintiff as DIRECTED on 1.2.19. Signed by Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis on 1/2/2019. (epri, )
November 29, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Victor Gilmore. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Proposed Jury Demand)(epri, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gilmore v. Louka, Esquire et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tariq K. Louka, Esquire
Represented By: James Arthur Cales, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Emerald Point Apartments
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Results Unlimited, Inc.
Represented By: Ronald Scott Canter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Victor Gilmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?