Lazarus v. Bell
Plaintiff: Bishop Leland Lazarus
Defendant: Anton Bell
Case Number: 2:2019cv00031
Filed: January 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Arenda L Wright Allen
Referring Judge: Lawrence R Leonard
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he is ORDERED to either sign the enclosed consent to collection of fees form and RETURN IT TO THE COURT or to submit the full filing fee of $350.00 within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of "Selected Procedural Information for Prisoners Who Have Filed a Civil Rights Complaint" to Plaintiff. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to comply with the procedural requirements outlined in that document. The Clerk is FURTHER DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order and the Consent to Collection of Fees form to Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen on 3/8/2019. Copies mailed 3/8/2019. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Collection of Fees and Selected Procedural Information for Prisoners Who Have Filed a Civil Rights Complaint)(jmey, )
February 22, 2019 Filing 7 Submission by Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope)(jmey, )
February 21, 2019 Filing 6 Response to #5 Order filed by Bishop Leland Lazarus. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, )
February 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. It is ORDERED that #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED without prejudice. #4 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file his Amended Complaint within thirty days from the date of entry of this Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of the Court's questionnaire to Plaintiff to assist Plaintiff in filing his Amended Complaint. Upon receipt of Plaintiff's completed questionnaire, the Clerk is DIRECTED to conditionally file it as an Amended Complaint. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen on 2/7/2019. Copies mailed 2/8/2019. (Attachments: #1 Questionnaire) (jmey, )
January 30, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Bishop Leland Lazarus. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(jmey, )
January 15, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Bishop Leland Lazarus. (jmey, )
January 15, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bishop Leland Lazarus. (jmey, )
January 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Conditionally filed against Anton Bell (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by Bishop Leland Lazarus. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (2 service copies provided.)(jmey, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lazarus v. Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anton Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bishop Leland Lazarus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?