Morrison v. Norfolk Southern Railway
| William Morrison |
| Norfolk Southern Railway |
| 2:2019cv00296 |
| June 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Raymond A Jackson |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Norfolk Southern Railway re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - Local Rule 7(E) Notice (Kushner, David) |
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Norfolk Southern Railway. (Kushner, David) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by William Morrison. (Thompson, Nicholas) |
| Filing 8 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Norfolk Southern Railway. (Kushner, David) |
| Filing 7 Brief in Support to #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Norfolk Southern Railway. (Kushner, David) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Norfolk Southern Railway. (Kushner, David) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Norfolk Southern Railway served on 6/17/2019. (jrin) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Norfolk Southern Railway. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Procedure for Civil Motions)(jrin) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons by William Morrison. (Thompson, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet non fillable by William Morrison. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 civil action summons)(Thompson, Nicholas) |
| Notice of Correction re #2 Civil Cover Sheet. Document number 2 contains summons as an attachment. Counsel directed to refile proposed summons as separate docket entry. (jrin) |
| Filing 1 Complaint 2:19cv00296 ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6671373.), filed by William Morrison. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Thompson, Nicholas) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, ) |
| Notice of Correction re #1 Complaint. The filing user has been requested to refile the Civil Cover sheet in a non-fillable pdf form using the Civil Cover Sheet event. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Morrison v. Norfolk Southern Railway | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway | |
| Represented By: | David Aaron Kushner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Morrison | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Delton Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
