O.M. v. Saul
| O. M. |
| Andrew Saul |
| SSA (Social Security Administration) |
| 2:2019cv00375 |
| July 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Arenda L Wright Allen |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by O. M.. Andrew Saul served on 7/25/2019, answer due 9/27/2019. (Richardson, Barrett) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by O. M.. Andrew Saul served on 7/29/2019, answer due 9/27/2019. (Richardson, Barrett) |
| Filing 5 Three (3) Summonses Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, ) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by O. M.. (Richardson, Barrett) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by O. M.. (Richardson, Barrett) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by O. M.. (Richardson, Barrett) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6744277.), filed by O. M.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Richardson, Barrett) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
