Benn v. Saul

Petitioner: Anthony Benn
Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2019cv00377
Filed: July 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 28:1361
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2019 Electronic Fee Payment - by Anthony Benn. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6746731.. (Gillikin, Robert)
July 18, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons all 3 summonses by Anthony Benn. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Gillikin, Robert)
July 18, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $ 400.), filed by Anthony Benn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gillikin, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benn v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony Benn
Represented By: Robert Wayne Gillikin, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?