Denson v. Ezzell et al
| Jason L. Denson |
| Mr. Ezzell, Tanya Blair and Alfred Lenyoun |
| 2:2019cv00397 |
| July 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Arenda L Wright Allen |
| Robert J Krask |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jason L. Denson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
| Filing 4 Consent to Collection of Fees by Jason L. Denson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER - If the Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he is ORDERED to either sign the enclosed Consent to Collection of Fees form and return it to the Court or to submit the full filing fee within 30 days of the entry of this order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the attached document. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to comply with the procedural requirements outlined in that document. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen on 8/6/19. (copy mailed 8/7/19)(afar)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jason L. Denson. (jmey, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Conditionally against Tanya Blair, Mr. Ezzell, Alfred Lenyoun (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by Jason L. Denson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (No service copies provided.)(jmey, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
