Holmes v. Warden
Petitioner: Demetrius A. Holmes
Respondent: Warden and Harold W. Clarke
Case Number: 2:2019cv00427
Filed: August 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Arenda L Wright Allen
Referring Judge: Douglas E Miller
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2019 Filing 13 Roseboro Notice as to Motion to Dismiss by Harold W. Clarke (Murphy, Eugene)
September 25, 2019 Filing 12 Memorandum in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Habeas Corpus Petition with Roseboro,. filed by Harold W. Clarke. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit)(Murphy, Eugene)
September 25, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Habeas Corpus Petition with Roseboro,. by Harold W. Clarke. (Murphy, Eugene)
September 25, 2019 Filing 10 Rule 5 RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Harold W. Clarke.(Murphy, Eugene)
September 9, 2019 Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Demetrius A. Holmes. (jmey, )
August 28, 2019 Filing 7 Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Harold W. Clarke. (Murphy, Eugene)
August 28, 2019 Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF Receipt as to #4 Order of Prisoner Service (2254), filed by Harold W. Clarke. (Murphy, Eugene)
August 28, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Eugene Paul Murphy on behalf of Harold W. Clarke (Murphy, Eugene)
August 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER of Service (2254) upon respondents. The Respondent is ORDERED to file within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order an answer to the petition conforming to the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, together with the attachments specified in Rule 5. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 8/27/2019. Copies mailed 8/27/2019.(jmey, )
August 26, 2019 Filing 8 Submission by Petitioner. Request for status. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, )
August 15, 2019 Filing 3 Submission by Petitioner. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, )
August 13, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing by Demetrius A. Holmes. (jmey, )
August 13, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION, Conditionally filed for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number 34683044722.), filed by Demetrius A. Holmes. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Receipt, #3 Envelope) (2 service copies provided.)(jmey, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holmes v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Demetrius A. Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Represented By: Eugene Paul Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?