Hanks v. Shafer Law Firm
| Tedra Hanks, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| John Does 1-25 and Shafer Law Firm, PC |
| 2:2019cv00428 |
| August 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Shafer Law Firm, PC. (Best, Robert) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Pro hac vice for Raphael Deutsch as to Tedra Hanks, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 10/08/2019. (bboy, )
|
| Filing 12 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Raphael Deutsch and Certification of Local Counsel Aryeh E. Stein Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6871867. by Tedra Hanks, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. (Stein, Aryeh) |
| Filing 11 Memorandum in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Tedra Hanks, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. (Stein, Aryeh) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tedra Hanks, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Shafer Law Firm, PC served on 8/22/2019, answer due 9/20/2019 (Stein, Aryeh) |
| Filing 9 Memorandum in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Shafer Law Firm, PC. (Best, Robert) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Shafer Law Firm, PC. (Best, Robert) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Shafer shall file its answer, pleading, or other response to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before Friday, 9/20/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 9/12/19. (afar)
|
| MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Douglas Miller. #5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint - Motion for Enlargement of Time (bboy, ) |
| Filing 6 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Shafer Law Firm, PC. (Best, Robert) |
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint - Motion for Enlargement of Time by Shafer Law Firm, PC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Best, Robert) |
| Filing 4 One Summons Issued as to Shafer Law Firm, PC. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Tedra Hanks, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. (Stein, Aryeh) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Tedra Hanks. (Stein, Aryeh) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6786447.), filed by Tedra Hanks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)(Stein, Aryeh) |
| Notice of Correction re 2 Proposed Summons. The filing user has been notified that document 2 is an incorrectly saved PDF fillable form and has been removed. The filing user was directed to refile the document.(epri, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
