Smith v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al
Glenn S Smith and Glenn S. Smith |
Carlie Field, The Church of Jeus Christ of Later-day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishops of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints |
2:2019cv00434 |
August 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Robert J Krask |
Henry C Morgan |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Reply to Motion re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Glenn S. Smith. (Breit, Jeffrey) |
Filing 10 Memorandum in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Carlie Field, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit)(Casey, Brian) |
Filing 9 Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(b) Conference it is ordered that the Final Pretrial Conference is set for 4/2/2020 at 02:30 PM in Norfolk. Jury Trial is set for 4/21/2020 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr on 9/12/2019. (sche) |
Rule 16b Scheduling Conference held on 9/12/2019. Kevin Biniazan appeared for the Plaintiff. Brian N. Casey appeared for the Defendants. (lbax, ) |
Filing 8 Memorandum in Support re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Glenn S. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Breit, Jeffrey) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Glenn S. Smith. (Breit, Jeffrey) |
Filing 6 RULE 26(f) PRETRIAL ORDER: Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference set for 9/12/2019 at 09:00 AM in Norfolk - Clerk's Office Conference Room, 1st Floor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask on 8/23/19. (lbax, ) |
Filing 5 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (Casey, Brian) |
Filing 4 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (Casey, Brian) |
Refer for 16(b). (bpet, ) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Carlie Field, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.(Casey, Brian) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Notice and Judge's Information to counsel. (epri, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr and Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask. (epri, ) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6791409.), filed by Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishops of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, The Church of Jesus Christ of Later-day Saints, Carlie Field. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Casey, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.