Armonti v. Padrsek et al
| Montcier P. Armonti and Montcler Paris Armonti |
| Sara Chandler and Padrsek |
| 2:2019cv00450 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Arenda L Wright Allen |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Submission by Plaintiff. Request for status. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER: If Plaintiff wishes the Complaint to be considered by the Court, Plaintiff is DIRECTED to sign and resubmit the Complaint within thirty days of the date of entry of this Order. Plaintiff is ADVISED that if Plaintiff does not sign and resubmit the Complaint within thirty days, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. A copy of this Order, along with Plaintiff's Complaint, sent to Plaintiff as DIRECTED on 10.11.19. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and filed on 10/11/2019. (epri, )
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Montcier P. Armonti. (jmey, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Conditionally filed (SUBJECT TO DEFECT - unsigned) against Sara Chandler, Padrsek (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by Montcier P. Armonti. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (No service copies provided.)(jmey, ) Modified on 10/8/2019 to edit docket text. (jmey, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
