Redmon v. Saul
Plaintiff: Deborah Miltier Redmon
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Case Number: 2:2019cv00511
Filed: September 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Lawrence R Leonard
Referring Judge: Rebecca Beach Smith
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Andrew Saul, via US Attorney, served on 10/8/2019. (epri, )
October 8, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Andrew Saul, via US Attorney General, served on 10/4/2019. (epri, )
October 3, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Andrew Saul, via SSA, served on 10/2/2019. (epri, ).
September 27, 2019 Filing 4 Three (3) Summonses Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Service packages delivered to US Marshal with certified copies of Order and USM 285 forms. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures, #2 USM 285 forms)(epri, )
September 27, 2019 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Deborah Miltier Redmon. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(epri, )
September 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Plaintiff's IFP Application, ECF No. 1, is GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's Complaint. The Clerk is FURTHER DIRECTED to issue summons in this action and prepare three packets containing a summons, a copy of the Complaint, and this Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to deliver these packets to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve the summons, Complaint, and this Order on the Attorney General of the United States, the United States Attorney, and the Social Security Administration, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 (i) (2). If the United States Marshal elects to use registered mail to effect service, the United States Marshal is REQUESTED to use registered mail, return receipt requested. The copy for the United States Attorney may be delivered to Kent Porter at the Office of the United States Attorney in Norfolk, Virginia. A copy of this Order was sent to Plaintiff as DIRECTED on 9.27.19. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 9/27/2019. (epri, )
September 26, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Deborah Miltier Redmon. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Attachment)(epri, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Redmon v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Miltier Redmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?