Evening Prayer, Inc. v. M/V President Roosevelt
| Evening Prayer, Inc. |
| M/V President FD Roosevelt |
| M/V MAULE |
| 2:2019cv00602 |
| November 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert G Doumar |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
RULE 26(f) PRETRIAL ORDER: Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference set for 1/8/2020 at 09:30 AM in Norfolk - Clerk's Office Conference Room, 1st Floor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 12/20/19. (lbax, )
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael David Pierce on behalf of M/V President FD Roosevelt (Pierce, Michael) |
| Refer for 16(b) (tamarm) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by M/V President FD Roosevelt.(Coberly, Mark) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by M/V President FD Roosevelt VERIFIED STATEMENT OF RIGHT OR INTEREST (Coberly, Mark) |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Evening Prayer, Inc.. (Ventker, David) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6923564.), filed by Evening Prayer, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Letter of Undertaking, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ventker, David) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/6/2019: #3 Verification of Complaint) (epri, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
