Daniels v. Charles Barker Automotive, Inc.
| Simon Daniels |
| Charles Barker Automotive, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv00699 |
| December 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert J Krask |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Count II. Count II is DISMISSED. The Motion is DENIED with respect to the punitive damages claim at this juncture. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 2/14/20. (mrees, )
|
| Filing 12 Request for Hearing by Charles Barker Automotive, Inc. re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Geller, Eileen) |
| Refer for 16(b) (mrees, ) |
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Charles Barker Automotive, Inc.. (Geller, Eileen) |
| Filing 10 Memorandum in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Simon Daniels. (Wiley, Steven) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Charles Barker Automotive, Inc.. (Geller, Eileen) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Vijay Kumar Mago on behalf of Charles Barker Automotive, Inc. (Mago, Vijay) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Charles Barker Automotive, Inc..(Geller, Eileen) |
| Filing 6 Memorandum in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Charles Barker Automotive, Inc.. (Geller, Eileen) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Charles Barker Automotive, Inc.. (Geller, Eileen) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Simon Daniels Charles Barker Automotive, Inc. served on 1/3/2020. (mrees, ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Charles Barker Automotive, Inc. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask. (epri, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Simon Daniels. (Wiley, Steven) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6998769.), filed by Simon Daniels. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wiley, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Daniels v. Charles Barker Automotive, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Charles Barker Automotive, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Vijay Kumar Mago |
| Represented By: | Eileen Ruth Geller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Simon Daniels | |
| Represented By: | Steven Blythe Wiley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
