PP v. Covan World Wide Moving Inc. et al
| PP |
| Terry L Dunn and Covan World Wide Moving Inc. |
| 2:2020cv00340 |
| June 25, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Arenda L Wright Allen |
| Robert J Krask |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
RULE 26(f) PRETRIAL ORDER: Rule 16(b) Telephone Scheduling Conference set for 8/31/2020 at 10:15 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask and filed on 7/29/2020. (lhow)
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Notice and Judge's Information to counsel. (epri, ) |
| Referred for 16(b). (epri, ) |
| Filing 4 COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Covan World Wide Moving Inc., Terry L Dunn. Modified on 6/26/2020 with redacted document. (epri, ). |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask. (epri, ) |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Covan World Wide Moving Inc. (Beck, Donald) . Modified on 6/26/2020 with redacted document. (epri, ). |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7269647.), filed by Covan World Wide Moving Inc., Terry L Dunn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Answer, #4 Exhibit C - Jury Demand)(Beck, Donald) Modified on 6/26/2020 with redacted documents.(epri, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
