Jackson v. Great Bridge Auto Sales Corporation
| William Buchanan Jackson |
| Great Bridge Auto Sales Corporation |
| 2:2020cv00392 |
| July 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert G Doumar |
| Lawrence R Leonard |
| Contract: Other |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 0327 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER that this matter be transferred to the Richmond Division of this Court and assigned to United States District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. Signed by Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis on 8/10/2020. (tamarm, )
|
|
Intradistrict Transfer to Richmond Division per Order entered by Chief Judge Davis on 8/10/20. (Richmond Case No. 3:20cv611). (jtho, )
|
|
Filing 4
RECUSAL ORDER. This Court FINDS that it must recuse itself; Clerk is DIRECTED to refer this matter to The Honorable Chief Mark S. Davis for him to determine to whom this case may be assigned. Signed by District Judge Robert G. Doumar on 8/5/2020. (tamarm, )
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Great Bridge Auto Sales Corporation. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, by William Buchanan Jackson. (Gayle, John) |
| Filing 1 Complaint William Buchanan Jackson v. Great Bridge Auto Sales Corporation, t/a Wine Automotive ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7328396.), filed by William Buchanan Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Repair Order, #2 Exhibit Buyers Guide, #3 Exhibit VAD 20, #4 Exhibit Warranty Service Contract, #5 Exhibit RISC, #6 Exhibit Hall Nissan Status Report, #7 Exhibit DMV Title History, # 8 Summons, #9 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Gayle, John) (Attachment 2 replaced on 7/31/2020) (tamarm, ). (Attachment 3 replaced on 7/31/2020) (tamarm, ). (Attachment 4 replaced on 7/31/2020) (tamarm, ). (Attachment 5 replaced on 7/31/2020) (tamarm, ). (Attachment 6 replaced on 7/31/2020) (tamarm, ). |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Robert G. Doumar and Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (epri, ) |
| Notice of Correction re #1 Complaint. Filing user has been directed to refile the proposed summons as a separate docket entry using its respective event. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Great Bridge Auto Sales Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Buchanan Jackson | |
| Represented By: | John Cole Gayle, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Great Bridge Auto Sales Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
