Albritton v. Carpenter
| DeVinche J. Albritton |
| M. Carpenter, A. Critton, Ms. White, Lt. Carpenter, M. Vandermark, Mr. Phat, Mr. McDonald, The Jane Doe Doctor, W. Brown, Correctional Officer Blizzard, Tony Darden, Lt. Branch, The Virginia Department of Corrections, Beth Cabell, Mr. Foster and John/Jane Doe |
| 2:2020cv00463 |
| September 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Arenda L Wright Allen |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DeVinche J. Albritton. (jmey, ) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT, Conditionally filed against Beth Cabell, Tony Darden, M. Vandermark, A. Critton, Mr. Foster, Ms. White, Mr. McDonald, Lt. Branch, Lt. Carpenter, Mr. Phat, John/Jane Doe, Correctional Officer Blizzard, W. Brown, The Virginia Department of Corrections, The Jane Doe Doctor, filed by DeVinche J. Albritton. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
| Filing 3 Submission by Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
| Filing 2 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (jmey, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Conditionally filed against M. Carpenter (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by DeVinche J. Albritton.(jmey, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
