Meyers v. Miller et al
Plaintiff: David Meyers
Defendant: A. Miller, City of Waverly Virginia, Eugene Murphy and Ivan Gilmore
Case Number: 2:2020cv00467
Filed: September 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Raymond A Jackson
Referring Judge: Lawrence R Leonard
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER. It is ORDERED that if Plaintiff wishes his submission to be considered by the Court, he is ORDERED to either (i) remit the statutory filing fee of $350.00, or (ii) complete and sign the enclosed in forma pauperis application and sign the enclosed Consent to Collection of Fees form, and then RETURN BOTH TO THE COURT within forty-five days of the date of entry of this Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order, a copy of the Court's in forma pauperis application, a copy of the Consent to Collection of Fees form, and a copy of the document titled, "Selected Procedural Information for Prisoners Who Have Filed a Civil Rights Complaint" to Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 10/5/2020. Copies mailed 10/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent to Collection of Fees Form and Selected Procedural Information for Prisoners Who Have Filed a Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Affidavit in Support of Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis)(jmey, )
September 17, 2020 Filing 3 Acknowledgment of Receipt. (jmey, )
September 16, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION to Transfer Case by David Meyers. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Letter, #3 Envelope)(jmey, )
September 16, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Conditionally filed against City of Waverly Virginia, Ivan Gilmore, A. Miller, Eugene Murphy (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by David Meyers. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (1 service copy provided.)(jmey, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Meyers v. Miller et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Waverly Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eugene Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ivan Gilmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Meyers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?