Lauter v. Schaefer, et al
| Robert Lauter |
| Amy Burnham, Jane Katoskie, George E. Schaefer, III, Doug Robelen, Glaxosmithkline, Kamala Lanetti, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Joseph Katoskie |
| 2:2020cv00507 |
| October 8, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Arenda L Wright Allen |
| Robert J Krask |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1986 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Motion to Amend by Robert Lauter. (afar) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Amy Burnham, Glaxosmithkline, Jane Katoskie, Joseph Katoskie, Kamala Lanetti, Doug Robelen, George E. Schaefer, III, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, filed by Robert Lauter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(afar) |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file Plaintiffs Complaint and Motion to Amend. Additionally, Plaintiffs Motion to Amend is GRANTED. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file his Amended Complaint, pursuant to the instructions provided herein, within thirty days from the date of entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen on 11/27/20. (copy mailed 11/27/20) (afar)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Lauter. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, # (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/19/2020: #4 Proposed Motion to Amend) (epri, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.