Mills v. City Of Norfolk, Virginia
Plaintiff: Rodney Mills
Defendant: Virginia City Of Norfolk and City of Norfolk, Virginia
Case Number: 2:2020cv00521
Filed: October 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Douglas E Miller
Referring Judge: Roderick C Young
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2020 Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by City of Norfolk, Virginia. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Mills Norfolk Circuit Court Appeal)(Beverly, Michael)
December 8, 2020 Filing 8 Memorandum in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Rodney Mills. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhbiit A-- July 29, 2019 letter, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B-- August 28, 2019 letter, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C--EEOC Charge)(Montgomery, Wayne)
November 25, 2020 Filing 7 Memorandum in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by City of Norfolk, Virginia. (Beverly, Michael)
November 25, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by City of Norfolk, Virginia. (Beverly, Michael)
November 24, 2020 Case Reassigned to District Judge Roderick C. Young. District Judge Raymond A. Jackson no longer assigned to the case. (afar)
November 13, 2020 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rodney Mills City of Norfolk, Virginia served on 11/5/2020, answer due 11/27/2020 (Montgomery, Wayne)
October 22, 2020 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to City of Norfolk, Virginia. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, )
October 22, 2020 Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Rodney Mills. (Montgomery, Wayne)
October 22, 2020 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Complaint by Rodney Mills. (Montgomery, Wayne)
October 22, 2020 Notice of Correction re #1 Complaint. Filing user has been directed to file a Civil Cover Sheet and link it to the initiating document. (epri, )
October 19, 2020 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, )
October 19, 2020 Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7452345.), filed by Rodney Mills.(Montgomery, Wayne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mills v. City Of Norfolk, Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Virginia City Of Norfolk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Norfolk, Virginia
Represented By: Michael Angelo Beverly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodney Mills
Represented By: Wayne Barry Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?