Thatch v. Pariser Dermatology Specialists, Ltd. et al
Latoya Thatch |
Pariser Dermatology Specialists, Ltd. and Cyndi Torosky |
2:2020cv00528 |
October 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Arenda L Wright Allen |
Lawrence R Leonard |
Douglas E Miller |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Two (2) Summonses Issued as to Pariser Dermatology Specialists, Ltd., Cyndi Torosky. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint Cyndi Torosky by Latoya Thatch. (Gaynor, Todd) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint Pariser Dermatology Specialists, Ltd. by Latoya Thatch. (Gaynor, Todd) |
Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard no longer assigned to the case. (afar) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7458932.), filed by Latoya Thatch. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gaynor, Todd) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.