Carpenter v. Portsmouth
| Latwan Carpenter |
| City Of Portsmouth and City of Portsmouth, Virginia |
| 2:2020cv00603 |
| December 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert J Krask |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Latwan Carpenter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Myers, Lenard) |
| Filing 5 Brief in Support to #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by City of Portsmouth, Virginia. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Casey, Brian) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by City of Portsmouth, Virginia. (Casey, Brian) |
| Filing 3 Case Reassigned to District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith. District Judge Raymond A. Jackson no longer assigned to the case. (afar) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Complaint by Latwan Carpenter. (Myers, Lenard) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask. (epri, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0422-7521610.), filed by Latwan Carpenter.(Myers, Lenard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
