United HealthCare Services, Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
| United Healthcare Services, Inc. |
| Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., MSP Singapore Co. LLC, Merck & Co, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Schering-Plough Corp. and Schering Corp. |
| 2:2020cv01005 |
| October 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting United Healthcare Services, Inc's Unopposed (1224) Motion to Be Relieved from Pretrial Order No. 9 And For A Limited Stay of Its Case in case 2:18-md-02836-RBS-DEM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 10/15/2020. See order for details. Copies distributed to all counsel. Associated Cases: 2:18-md-02836-RBS-DEM, 2:20-cv-01005-RBS-DEM (clou )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Marie Cheng on behalf of United Healthcare Services, Inc. (Cheng, Katherine) |
| Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Minnesota; Case Number 0:20-cv-01909. Original file and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 6 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-2) transferring case to the Eastern District of Virginia per the MDL Panel for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Case assigned to Judge Rebecca Beach Smith.(kt) [Transferred from Minnesota on 10/6/2020.] |
| Filing 5 (Text-Only): Notice re: Non-Admitted AttorneyWe have received documents listing Hammish P.M. Hume, Abby L. Dennis, Edward H. Takashima, Judith A. Zahid, Eric W. Buetzow, James R. Martin, Jennifer Duncan Hackett as counsel of record. If he or she wishes to be listed as an attorney of record in this case, he or she must be admitted to the bar of the U.S. District Court of Minnesota in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (a), (b) and (c) or temporarily admitted pro hac vice in accordance with #Local Rule 83.5 (d) or (e).For more admissions information and forms, please see the Attorney Forms Section of the courts website at #www.mnd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms#. (kt) [Transferred from Minnesota on 10/6/2020.] |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC, Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Schering Corp., Schering-Plough Corp.. (kt) [Transferred from Minnesota on 10/6/2020.] |
| Filing 3 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge David S. Doty per 3rd/4th Antitrust list, referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. Please use case number 20-cv-1909 DSD/DTS. (kt) [Transferred from Minnesota on 10/6/2020.] |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Parent corporation, publicly held corporation or wholly-owned subsidiary reported for Plaintiff United HealthCare Services, Inc.. (Kniffen, Elizabeth) [Transferred from Minnesota on 10/6/2020.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited, MSP Singapore Company LLC, Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Schering Corporation, Schering-Plough Corporation (filing fee $ 400, receipt number AMNDC-8032238) filed by United HealthCare Services, Inc.. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Kniffen, Elizabeth) [Transferred from Minnesota on 10/6/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
