Whaff v. Saul
| Sabrina Whaff |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| SSA (Social Security Administration) |
| 2:2021cv00037 |
| January 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Raymond A Jackson |
| Robert J Krask |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by SSA (Social Security Administration). All Defendants. (Gillikin, Robert)
|
|
Filing 4
Certificate Reporting Service by Andrew M. Saul. Andrew M. Saul served on 2/1/2021, answer due 4/2/2021. (Porter, Kent)
|
|
Filing 3
Three (3) Summonses Issued as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, )
|
|
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask. (epri, )
|
|
Filing 2
Proposed Summons all 3 summonses by Sabrina Whaff. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Gillikin, Robert)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0422-7586769.), filed by Sabrina Whaff. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gillikin, Robert)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
