George v. Aldi et al
| Rose George |
| Shawn Simmons, Zach Whitehead, Jessica Berry, Ryan Klavan and Aldi |
| 2:2021cv00174 |
| April 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Raymond A Jackson |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: The Individual Defendants are hereby DISMISSED from this action. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the Individual Defendants as Defendants on the docket of this matter. Copies of this order sent as DIRECTED on 5.20.21. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 5/20/2021. (epri, )
|
| Filing 9 MOTION of Corrected Application for Pro Hac Vice of Frederick T. Smith by Aldi. (Costantino, Christine) |
| Filing 8 MOTION of Corrected Application for Pro Hac Vice of Alia S. Wynne by Aldi. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(Costantino, Christine) |
| Notice of Correction re #6 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Alia S. Wynne and #7 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Frederick T. Smith and Certification of Local Counsel Christine Costantino. The motions do not contain the signatures of the applicants. Local counsel should file corrected motions that include the written signatures of the applicants. Counsel should not pay the fees a second time. (tlev, ) |
| Filing 7 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Frederick T. Smith and Certification of Local Counsel Christine Costantino Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-7792171. by Aldi. (Costantino, Christine) |
| Filing 6 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Alia S. Wynne and Certification of Local Counsel Christine Costantino Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-7792132. by Aldi. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(Costantino, Christine) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Aldi. Aldi waiver sent on 4/15/2021, answer due 6/14/2021. (Costantino, Christine) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Rose George. (epri, ) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against all defendants., filed by Rose George.(epri, ) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Plaintiff's IFP Application, ECF No. 1, is GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's Complaint and Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED at this time. Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, within thirty days from the date of entry of this Order, why the Individual Defendants should not be dismissed from this action.The Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare a Notice of Lawsuit and Waiver of Service form for Defendant Aldi. A copy of the Complaint, this Order, the Notice of Lawsuit, and two copies of the Waiver of Service form are to be sent to Defendant Aldi at the address provided by Plaintiff. If Defendant Aldi fails to waive service, the Clerk is DIRECTED to (i) issue a summons; (ii) prepare a packet containing a summons, a copy of the Complaint, and this Order for Defendant Aldi; and (iii) deliver the packet to the United States Marshal, who is DIRECTED to serve the packet upon Defendant Aldi. A copy of this Order was sent to Plaintiff as DIRECTED on 4.15.21. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/15/2021. (epri, ) Modified on 4/15/2021 (epri, ).
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rose George. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Proposed Motion for appt of counsel, #3 Proposed service docs)(epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
