Mulvey v. Walsh
John A. Mulvey |
Martin J. Walsh and United States Government |
2:2021cv00305 |
June 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Robert J Krask |
Rebecca Beach Smith |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 5, is GRANTED, and this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Copies of Order sent as DIRECTED on 7.21.21. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 7/21/2021. (epri, ) |
Filing 5 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS by John A. Mulvey. (epri, ) |
Filing 4 Letter to Court from Plaintiff. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Envelope)(epri, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to United States Government, served on 6/15/2021; Martin J. Walsh served on 6/15/2021. (epri, ) |
Filing 2 Three (3) Summonses Issued as to United States Government, Martin J. Walsh, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Service packages mailed to pro se plaintiff on 6/3/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin J. Walsh ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 24683048689.), filed by John A. Mulvey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Receipt)(epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.