Gilliam v. Hess
| Rashia LeKesha Barnes Gilliam |
| Ellen Marie Hess |
| 2:2021cv00384 |
| July 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Lawrence R Leonard |
| Roderick C Young |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Memorandum in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. filed by Ellen Marie Hess. (Adams, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim with Roseboro,. by Ellen Marie Hess. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Adams, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel Willer Adams on behalf of Ellen Marie Hess (Adams, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by William Daniel Prince, IV on behalf of Ellen Marie Hess (Prince, William)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by William Woodul Tunner on behalf of Ellen Marie Hess (Tunner, William)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Marie Hess, served on 8/6/2021. (epri, )
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to Ellen Marie Hess. Service package delivered to U.S. Marshal with certified copy of Order and USM 285 form. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures, #2 USM 285 form)(epri, )
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing by Rashia LeKesha Barnes Gilliam. (epri,
|
|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT against Ellen Marie Hess, filed by Rashia LeKesha Barnes Gilliam.(epri, )
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Plaintiff's IFP Application, ECF No. 1, is GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's Complaint and E-Noticing Request. The Clerk is DIRECTED to issue a summons in this action and prepare a service packet containing a summons, a copy of the Complaint, and this Order. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to deliver the service packet to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve the summons, Complaint, and this Order on the Commissioner of the Virginia Employment Commission. Plaintiff's E-Noticing Request is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to add Plaintiff's e-mail address to this case, and docket this Order in the Courts electronic filing system. Order sent to Plaintiff electronically as DIRECTED on 8.4.21. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young and filed on 8/4/2021. (epri, )
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rashia LeKesha Barnes Gilliam. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Electronic Filing Request)(afar)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gilliam v. Hess | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rashia LeKesha Barnes Gilliam | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ellen Marie Hess | |
| Represented By: | Rachel Willer Adams |
| Represented By: | William Daniel Prince, IV |
| Represented By: | William Woodul Tunner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
