Mitchell v. GEICO Corporate Office et al
Mikeyla K. Mitchell |
GEICO Corporate Office and Impact Mental Health Services |
2:2021cv00434 |
July 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Mark S Davis |
Lawrence R Leonard |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Submission by Mikeyla K. Mitchell. (epri, ) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk on 9/9/2021. (epri, ) |
Filing 4 DISMISSAL ORDER: This matter is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. A copy of this Order was sent to Plaintiff as DIRECTED on 9.9.21. Signed by Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 9/9/2021. (epri, ) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against GEICO Corporate Office, Impact Mental Health Services, filed by Mikeyla K. Mitchell.(epri, ) |
Filing 2 ORDER: Plaintiff's IFP Application, ECF No. 1, is GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's Complaint. If Plaintiff would like the Court to consider her Complaint, Plaintiff is ORDERED to sign and resubmit her Complaint within thirty days from the date of entry of this Order. A copy of this Order was sent as DIRECTED on 8.4.21. Signed by Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 8/4/2021. (epri, ) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mikeyla K. Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.