Gayle v. Unilever Manufacturing (US), Inc.
Lisa Gayle |
Unilever Manufacturing (US), Inc. |
2:2021cv00445 |
August 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Raymond A Jackson |
Douglas E Miller |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Refer for 16(b) (jhie, ) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint by Unilever Manufacturing (US), Inc..(Sallis, Justin) |
![]() |
Filing 10 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Bridget B. Romero and Certification of Local Counsel Justin L. Sallis Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-8008204. by Unilever Manufacturing (US), Inc.. (Sallis, Justin) |
![]() |
MOTION REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller: #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (or Otherwise Respond to Complaint - Unopposed) (jhie, ) |
Filing 8 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Unilever Manufacturing (US), Inc.. (Sallis, Justin) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (or Otherwise Respond to Complaint - Unopposed) by Unilever Manufacturing (US), Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Consent Order)(Sallis, Justin) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin Lydell Sallis on behalf of Unilever Manufacturing (US), Inc. (Sallis, Justin) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lisa Gayle Unilever Manufacturing (US), Inc. served on 8/19/2021, answer due 9/9/2021 (Goodwin, Brandan) |
Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Complaint by Lisa Gayle. (Goodwin, Brandan) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Unilever Manufacturing (US), Inc. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
Notice of Correction re #1 Complaint. Document number [1-1] is an incorrectly saved PDF fillable form which we have removed. Please refile the document after saving it correctly. (epri, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, ) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint Unilever Manufacturing (US), Inc. by Lisa Gayle. (Goodwin, Brandan) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-7925887.), filed by Lisa Gayle. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goodwin, Brandan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gayle v. Unilever Manufacturing (US), Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lisa Gayle | |
Represented By: | Brandan Matthew Goodwin |
Represented By: | John Michael Kaptan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Unilever Manufacturing (US), Inc. | |
Represented By: | Justin Lydell Sallis |
Represented By: | Bridget B Romero |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.