Corman Kokosing Construction Company v. Branscome, Inc.
Branscome, Inc. doing business as Branscome Concrete |
Corman Kokosing Construction Company |
Branscome, Inc. |
2:2021cv00594 |
October 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Lawrence R Leonard |
Rebecca Beach Smith |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Leonard. #14 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #9 Counterclaim,,,,, (mrees, ) |
Filing 14 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #9 Counterclaim,,,,, by Corman Kokosing Construction Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Consent Motion)(Turner, Patricia) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. CKCC shall respond to Branscome's Counterclaim on or before December 27, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard on 12/13/21. (dbra, ) |
MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: #12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #9 Counterclaim (dbra, ) |
Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #9 Counterclaim by Corman Kokosing Construction Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hester, Clay) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth Brett Marston, I on behalf of Branscome, Inc. (Marston, Kenneth) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Branscome, Inc.. (Starks, Ryan) |
Filing 9 Branscome, Inc. d/b/a Branscome Concrete's Counterclaim COUNTERCLAIM Branscome, Inc. d/b/a Branscome Concrete's Counterclaim against Corman Kokosing Construction Company, Branscome, Inc. d/b/a Branscome Concrete's Counterclaim COUNTERCLAIM Branscome, Inc. d/b/a Branscome Concrete's Counterclaim against Corman Kokosing Construction Company, filed by Branscome, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7)(Starks, Ryan) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew O. Gay on behalf of Branscome, Inc. (Gay, Andrew) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Branscome, Inc..(Starks, Ryan) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan John Starks on behalf of Branscome, Inc. (Starks, Ryan) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Corman Kokosing Construction Company Branscome, Inc. served on 11/1/2021, answer due 11/22/2021 (Hester, Clay) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Branscome, Inc., NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Corman Kokosing Construction Company. (Hester, Clay) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, by Corman Kokosing Construction Company. (Hester, Clay) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8075441.), filed by Corman Kokosing Construction Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Hester, Clay) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.