Van Emburgh et al v. The United States of America
Estate of Eleusipa Van Emburgh, by and though its Administrator James Michael Van Emburgh, James Michael Van Emburgh, James Alan Van Emburgh, Imelda Crovetto, Amy Rivera, Alexis Navarro and Rafael Navarro |
The United States of America |
2:2021cv00603 |
November 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Raymond A Jackson |
Lawrence R Leonard |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 First Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Andrew David Cherkasky and Certification of Local Counsel Benjamin A. Beliles Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-8087717. by Imelda Crovetto, Estate of Eleusipa Van Emburgh, by and though its Administrator James Michael Van Emburgh, Alexis Navarro, Rafael Navarro, Amy Rivera, James Alan Van Emburgh, James Michael Van Emburgh. (Beliles, Benjamin) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8087598.), filed by Alexis Navarro, Eleusipa Van Emburgh, Imelda Crovetto, James Alan Van Emburgh, Rafael Navarro, James Michael Van Emburgh, Amy Rivera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Beliles, Benjamin) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.