Buttenhoff v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Dennis Buttenhoff
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Case Number: 2:2021cv00612
Filed: November 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Mark S Davis
Referring Judge: Robert J Krask
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security, via U.S. Attorney, served on 11/30/2021. (epri, )
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security - via Attorney General - served on 11/24/2021. (epri, )
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security, served on 11/22/2021.(epri, )
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Three (3) Summonses Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Service packets delivered to U.S. Marshal with certified copies of IFP Order and USM 285 forms. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures, #2 USM 285 forms)(epri, )
November 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER ON APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES is GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file the complaint and issue summons, and the United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and this order upon the defendant(s), as directed by the plaintiff. All cost of service shall be advanced by the United States. Signed by Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis on 11/12/2021. (epri, )
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Initial Case Assignment to Chief District Judge Mark S. Davis and Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask. (epri, )
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Dennis Buttenhoff. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 USM-285 Forms, #4 USM-285 Forms, #5 USM-285 Form)(Goss, John)
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Dennis Buttenhoff. (Goss, John)
November 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Complaint , filed by Dennis Buttenhoff. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goss, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buttenhoff v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dennis Buttenhoff
Represented By: John Osborne Goss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA (Social Security Administration)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?