Carter v. Sentient Digital, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Esther L. Carter
Defendant: Sentient Digital, Inc., Brooke Wojtowicz and Sentient Digital, Inc. doing business as Entrust Solutions
Case Number: 2:2021cv00625
Filed: November 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth W Hanes
Referring Judge: Douglas E Miller
2 Judge: Roderick C Young
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 11, 2022 Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Accompanying Brief with Roseboro,. by Sentient Digital, Inc.. (Brogan, Patrick)
October 28, 2022 Filing 15 MOTION for Issuance of Subpoenas by Esther L. Carter. (epri, )
October 28, 2022 Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Sentient Digital, Inc., filed by Esther L. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Letter)(epri, )
October 5, 2022 Case Reassigned to District Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes. District Judge Roderick C. Young no longer assigned to the case. (afar)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Extension, ECF No. 11, is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an Amended Complaint, pursuant to the instructions set forth in the Court's July 18, 2022 Memorandum Opinion, within thirty days of the date of entry of this Order. Copies of this Order sent as DIRECTED on 9.28.22. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young and filed on 9/28/22. (epri, )
August 29, 2022 Filing 12 Memorandum in Opposition re #11 MOTION for Extension filed by Sentient Digital, Inc., Brooke Wojtowicz. (Brogan, Patrick)
August 15, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of time by Esther L. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(epri, )
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date of entry of this Order. As a result, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF 6, and Plaintiff's Motion for Subpoena, ECF 7, are DISMISSED as moot. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 7/18/22. (copy mailed 7/18/22)(afar)
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Court will sua sponte GRANT Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint. Plaintiff will be ORDERED to file an Amended Complaint, pursuant to the instructions set forth herein, within thirty days. As a result, Defendants Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 6, and Plaintiff's Motion for Subpoena, ECF No. 7, will be DISMISSED as moot. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 7/18/22. (afar)
April 6, 2022 Filing 8 Request for Hearing by Sentient Digital, Inc., Brooke Wojtowicz re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Accompanying Brief with Roseboro,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Brogan, Patrick)
January 14, 2022 Filing 7 Subpoena/Request for Technical Documentation - Criteria Corp by Esther L. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(epri, )
January 5, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Accompanying Brief with Roseboro,. by Sentient Digital, Inc., Brooke Wojtowicz. (Brogan, Patrick)
January 5, 2022 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sentient Digital, Inc.. (Brogan, Patrick)
December 20, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Brooke Wojtowicz, served on 12/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(epri, )
December 20, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Sentient Digital, Inc., served on 12/14/2021. #1 Envelope) (epri, ).
November 23, 2021 Filing 2 Two (2) Summones Issued as to Sentient Digital, Inc., Brooke Wojtowicz. Service packets mailed to pro se plaintiff on 11.23.21. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, )
November 18, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sentient Digital, Inc., Brooke Wojtowicz ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 24683050082.), filed by Esther L. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Receipt)(epri, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carter v. Sentient Digital, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Esther L. Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sentient Digital, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brooke Wojtowicz
Represented By: Patrick Michael Brogan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sentient Digital, Inc. doing business as Entrust Solutions
Represented By: Patrick Michael Brogan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?