Murphy v. Leu
| Andrew Raymond Murphy |
| David Leu |
| 2:2022cv00110 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Roderick C Young |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER of Service (2241) upon respondents. The Respondent is ORDERED to file within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order an answer to the petition conforming to the requirements, where applicable to a federal prisoner, of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, together with the attachments specified in Rule 5. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 3/31/2022. Copies mailed 3/31/2022.(jmey, )
|
|
Filing 8
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 24683051154. (jmey, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER. It is DETERMINED that petitioner has access to sufficient assets to pay a filing fee of $5.00, and it is ORDERED that petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of fees and costs is DENIED pending receipt of information specified below. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that within 30 days from the date of this Order the petitioner must accomplish one of the following actions: 1. Remit $5.00 as a filing fee to the Clerk of the Court. 2. Request an extension of time in which to pay the filing fee. 3. Demonstrate that he lacks the ability to pay the $5.00 filing fee, or demonstrate other factors which would justify failure to pay a filing fee. The petition shall remain CONDITIONALLY FILED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to the petitioner. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 3/24/2022. Copies mailed 3/24/2022.(jmey, )
|
|
Filing 6
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, )
|
|
Filing 5
REFERRAL ORDER. It is ORDERED that this matter is REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller for further proceedings. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Referral Order to Petitioner. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 3/14/2022. Copies mailed 3/14/2022.(jmey, )
|
|
Filing 4
Letter to Custodian of Inmate Accounts, FCI Petersburg-Low. (jmey, )
|
|
Filing 3
Acknowledgment of Receipt. (tlev, )
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andrew Raymond Murphy. (tlev, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION conditionally filed for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 0.00.), filed by Andrew Raymond Murphy.(tlev, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/10/2022: #1 Envelope) (tlev, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Murphy v. Leu | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Andrew Raymond Murphy | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: David Leu | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
