Moone v. Clarke
| Nathaniel Howard Moone |
| Director Harold Clarke |
| 2:2022cv00135 |
| April 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Arenda L Wright Allen |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nathaniel Howard Moone. (jmey, ) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED Petition against Harold Clarke, filed by Nathaniel Howard Moone. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmey, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER. It is ORDERED that Petitioner file within 30 days from the date of this Order an amended signed petition on the "Form for Use in Applications for Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254," including proof of exhaustion. It is further ORDERED that, along with the filing of Petitioner's amended petition, he must: 1. Remit $5.00 as a filing fee to the Clerk of this Court, or 2. Complete and submit to the Clerk of this Court an "Affidavit in Support of Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis." The petition shall remain CONDITIONALLY FILED, subject to defect. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order, along with two copies each of the above-mentioned forms, with the case number affixed, to the Petitioner at the address on file with the court. Petitioner is DIRECTED to complete and file one copy of each form with the court and to retain the other copy for his records. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 4/25/2022. Copies mailed 4/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Affidavit in Support of Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis) (jmey, )
|
| Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of Virginia Western; Case Number 7:22-cv-00160. Original file and docket sheet received. (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/5/2022: #2 Prisoner Data Report) (ldab, ). |
| Notification of transfer of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus from the Western District of VA Case No. 7:22cv160 to the Eastern District of Virginia. (ldab, ) |
|
Filing 2
Order transferring case to the Eastern District of Virginia. Signed by Senior Judge James P. Jones on 4/4/2022. (Order mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(aab) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 4/5/2022.]
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Nathaniel Howard Moone. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(tvt) [Transferred from Virginia Western on 4/5/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moone v. Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Nathaniel Howard Moone | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Director Harold Clarke | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
