Witowski v. Stepney, et al
| Russell Witowski |
| City of Chesapeake Police Department, Officer Keijon James, Officer Larry Stepney, Officer Anthony Elbert, John Doe Officers, Larry Stepney, Anthony Elbert, Keijon James and The City of Chesapeake Police Department |
| 2:2022cv00136 |
| April 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert J Krask |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER. Settlement conference scheduled for 11/14/22 at 1:30pm; memorandum due by noon on 11/7/22; see Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask on 5/24/22. (bpet, )
|
|
Filing 11
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(b) Conference it is ordered that the Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/18/2022 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk. Jury Trial set for 12/6/2022 at 11:00 AM before District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith. Settlement Conference set for 11/14/2022 at 01:30 PM in Norfolk before Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 5/19/2022. (vwar)
|
| Scheduling Conference - Rule 16b held on 5/19/2022. (tamarm, ) |
| Set Hearings: Settlement Conference set for 11/14/2022 at 01:30 PM in Norfolk Judges Chamber before Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask. (btit) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Chanel Ann Gray on behalf of Anthony Elbert, Keijon James, John Doe Officers, Larry Stepney, The City of Chesapeake Police Department (Gray, Chanel) |
|
Filing 9
RULE 26(f) PRETRIAL ORDER: Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference set for 5/19/2022 at 09:30 AM by conference call to be initiated by counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask on 5/2/2022. (tamarm, )
|
| Refer for 16(b) (bpet, ) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Defendant City of Chesapeake Police Department's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 4/26/2022. (dbra, )
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Russell Witowski. (Leckie, Eric) |
| Filing 6 Memorandum in Support re #5 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by City of Chesapeake Police Department. (Bergren, Ellen) |
| Filing 5 First MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by City of Chesapeake Police Department. (Bergren, Ellen) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Anthony Elbert, Keijon James, John Doe Officers, Larry Stepney.(Bergren, Ellen) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by City of Chesapeake Police Department, Anthony Elbert, Keijon James, John Doe Officers, Larry Stepney. (Bergren, Ellen) |
| Filing 2 Magistrate Judge Notice and Judge's Information to counsel. (epri, ) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal by Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8329670.), filed by Anthony Elbert, City of Chesapeake Police Department, Larry Stepney, Keijon James. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A, #2 Exhibit Ex. B, #3 Exhibit Ex. C)(Bergren, Ellen) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask. (epri, ) |
| Notice of Correction re #1 Notice of Removal. A Civil Cover Sheet should have been attached to your initiating document. The filing user is thus notified to file a Civil Cover Sheet. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
