Jordan v. School Board of the City of Norfolk et al
| Cheryl R. Jordan |
| School Board of the City of Norfolk, Norfolk Public Schools and School Board of the City of Norfolk d/b/a Norfolk Public Schools |
| 2:2022cv00167 |
| April 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Request for Hearing by School Board of the City of Norfolk re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim First Amended Complaint (McClellan, Kristopher)
|
|
Filing 11
REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim First Amended Complaint filed by School Board of the City of Norfolk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(McClellan, Kristopher)
|
|
Filing 10
Memorandum in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim First Amended Complaint filed by Cheryl R. Jordan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Martingayle, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 9
Memorandum in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim First Amended Complaint filed by School Board of the City of Norfolk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Konate v. Norfolk State University, #2 Exhibit Andre v. Southampton Co. School Board)(McClellan, Kristopher)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim First Amended Complaint by School Board of the City of Norfolk. (McClellan, Kristopher)
|
|
Filing 7
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Cheryl R. Jordan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R)(Martingayle, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 6
Memorandum in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Norfolk Public Schools and School Board of the City of Norfolk filed by School Board of the City of Norfolk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1 - Article, #2 Exhibit Ex 2 - School Board Minutes, #3 Exhibit Ex 3 - Konate v. NSU, #4 Exhibit Ex 4 - Andre v. Southampton School Board)(McClellan, Kristopher)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Norfolk Public Schools and by School Board of the City of Norfolk. (McClellan, Kristopher)
|
|
Filing 4
Civil Cover Sheet re #1 Notice of Removal by School Board of the City of Norfolk. (McClellan, Kristopher)
|
|
Filing 3
Magistrate Judge Notice and Judge's Information to counsel. (epri, )
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Bonnie Patricia Lane on behalf of Norfolk Public Schools, School Board of the City of Norfolk (Lane, Bonnie)
|
|
Filing 1
Notice of Removal , filed by School Board of the City of Norfolk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint)(McClellan, Kristopher)
|
|
Electronic Fee Payment - as to #1 Notice of Removal by School Board of the City of Norfolk. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8358860.. (McClellan, Kristopher)
|
|
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, )
|
|
Notice of Correction re #1 Notice of Removal. A Civil Cover Sheet should have been attached to your initiating document. Please file and link to ECF 1. (epri, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
