IPL Management, LLC v. CMA CGM (America), LLC
| IPL Management, LLC |
| CMA CGM (America), LLC and CMA CGM S.A. |
| 2:2022cv00203 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Arenda L Wright Allen |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CMA CGM (America), LLC. (Powers, Edward) |
| Filing 14 Memorandum in Support re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by CMA CGM (America), LLC. (Powers, Edward) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by CMA CGM (America), LLC. (Powers, Edward) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by IPL Management, LLC CMA CGM (America), LLC served on 6/23/2022, answer due 7/14/2022 (Parks, Kellam) |
| Filing 11 Two (2) Summons Issued as to CMA CGM (America), LLC, CMA CGM S.A., NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedure)(mrees, ) |
| Filing 10 Proposed Summons for CMA CGM (America), LLC by IPL Management, LLC. (Parks, Kellam) |
| Filing 9 Proposed Summons for CMA CGM S.A. by IPL Management, LLC. (Parks, Kellam) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by IPL Management, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Parks, Kellam) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Roman V. Gambourg as certified by local counsel Kellam T. Parks for Plaintiff IPL Management, LLC. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen on 05/31/2022. (Allen, Arenda)
|
| Filing 6 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Roman V. Gambourg and Certification of Local Counsel Kellam T. Parks Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-8409345. by IPL Management, LLC. (Parks, Kellam) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by IPL Management, LLC CMA CGM (America), LLC served on 5/19/2022, answer due 6/9/2022 (Parks, Kellam) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to CMA CGM (America), LLC, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedure)(mrees, ) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons by IPL Management, LLC. (Parks, Kellam) |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by IPL Management, LLC. (Parks, Kellam) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8389740.), filed by IPL Management, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Parks, Kellam) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
