Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Giant Eagle, Inc.
Defendant: Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Schering-Plough Corp., Schering Corp., MSP Singapore Co. LLC, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA
Case Number: 2:2022cv00268
Filed: June 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Lawrence R Leonard
Referring Judge: Douglas E Miller
2 Judge: Rebecca Beach Smith
3 Judge: Roderick C Young
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2022 Cases associated. (tamarm, )
July 25, 2022 Case has been consolidated with 2:18md2836. All filings should be made in 2:18md2836. (tamarm, )
July 25, 2022 Case reassigned to District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. District Judge Roderick C. Young, Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard no longer assigned to the case. (tamarm, )
July 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 Order Addressing Consolidation and Coordination. The Motion to Consolidate Cases #17 is granted and this action is consolidated, for all purposes, with the MDL case and reassigned to the Honorable Rebecca Beach Smith. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 7/25/2022. (dbra, )
July 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: The parties are directed to come to the 7/22/22 status conference prepared to discuss and resolve the issues outlined in the attached agenda. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 7/19/22. (Attachments: #1 Agenda for Status Conference) (bpet, )
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER: Glenmark's Motion to Continue Oral Argument is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The court ADJUSTS oral argument before the Magistrate Judge as follows: Oral argument for 7/20/22 is cancelled; in-person oral argument will be held on 7/21/22 and will proceed according to the schedule detailed herein; Defendants' motions for summary judgment will be argued in August 2022. The status conference remains scheduled for 7/22/22. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 7/13/22. (bpet, )
July 13, 2022 Filing 18 Memorandum in Support re #17 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Giant Eagle, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order for Consolidation)(Sawyer, John)
July 13, 2022 Filing 17 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Giant Eagle, Inc.. (Sawyer, John)
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Pro hac vice for Erin Gibson Allen as to Giant Eagle, Inc. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 07/12/2022. (tlev, )
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Pro hac vice for Moira Cain-Mannix as to Giant Eagle, Inc. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 7/12/2022. (tlev, )
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Pro hac vice for Brian C. Hill as to Giant Eagle, Inc. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 07/12/2022. (tlev, )
July 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Pro hac vice for Bernard D. Marcus as to Giant Eagle, Inc. Signed by District Judge Roderick C. Young on 7/12/2022. (tlev, )
July 11, 2022 Filing 12 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Erin Gibson Allen and Certification of Local Counsel John F. Sawyer by Giant Eagle, Inc.. (Sawyer, John)
July 11, 2022 Filing 11 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Brian C. Hill and Certification of Local Counsel John F. Sawyer by Giant Eagle, Inc.. (Sawyer, John)
July 11, 2022 Filing 10 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Bernard D. Marcus and Certification of Local Counsel John F. Sawyer by Giant Eagle, Inc.. (Sawyer, John)
July 11, 2022 Filing 9 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Moira Cain-Mannix and Certification of Local Counsel John F. Sawyer by Giant Eagle, Inc.. (Sawyer, John)
July 11, 2022 Filing 8 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Moira Cain-Mannix and Certification of Local Counsel John F. Sawyer by Giant Eagle, Inc.. (Sawyer, John)
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: If Plaintiffs desire their cases to be consolidated as part of the MDL, they are DIRECTED to file a motion for consolidation in their original case requesting reassignment to United States District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith, the MDL transferee judge. As a result of pending deadlines in the MDL, Plaintiffs should file this motion no later than Wednesday, July 13, 2022. In accordance the Panel's Rule 7.2(a), as well as other applicable rules, Judge Smith, in consultation with the previously assigned district judges, Judge Arenda Wright Allen and Judge Roderick C. Young, will then determine whether to consolidate the cases with the pending MDL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 7/8/2022. (dbra, )
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: If any party desires to file a position statement addressing only the requests to adjust the schedule for oral argument on the previously briefed motions addressed herein, the court DIRECTS such filing to be submitted via CM/ECF by noon on 7/12/22. The court will address the requests by separate order after reviewing all submissions. No party is requesting any change in the status conference, which remains scheduled for 7/22/22. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 7/8/22. (bpet, )
July 1, 2022 Notice of Correction re #2 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Bernard D. Marcus, #3 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Moira Cain-Mannix, #5 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Erin Gibson Allen and #4 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Brian C. Hill and Certification of Local Counsel John F. Sawyer. The motions do not contain the signatures of the applicants. Local counsel should file corrected motions that include the written signatures of the applicants. Counsel should not pay the fees a second time. (tlev, )
June 30, 2022 Filing 5 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Erin Gibson Allen and Certification of Local Counsel John F. Sawyer Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-8454864. by Giant Eagle, Inc.. (Sawyer, John)
June 30, 2022 Filing 4 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Brian C. Hill and Certification of Local Counsel John F. Sawyer Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-8454831. by Giant Eagle, Inc.. (Sawyer, John)
June 30, 2022 Filing 3 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Moira Cain-Mannix and Certification of Local Counsel John F. Sawyer Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-8454827. by Giant Eagle, Inc.. (Sawyer, John)
June 30, 2022 Filing 2 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Bernard D. Marcus and Certification of Local Counsel John F. Sawyer Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-8454804. by Giant Eagle, Inc.. (Sawyer, John)
June 30, 2022 Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8453847.), filed by Giant Eagle, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sawyer, John)
June 30, 2022 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Roderick C. Young and Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (epri, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Giant Eagle, Inc.
Represented By: John Frederick Sawyer
Represented By: Bernard Marcus
Represented By: Brian Hill
Represented By: Erin Gibson Allen
Represented By: Moira Cain-Mannix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck & Co, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schering-Plough Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schering Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MSP Singapore Co. LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?